The Final Project: Professional Reports and Theses
Students in the CRP program have two choices for a final project to earn their Masters Degree (MSCRP):
- You can write a Professional Report (PR), or
- You can write a Masters Thesis
Most students choose to write a professional report rather than a thesis. Your decision should be based on: 1) the purpose of the project for you; 2) the types of questions that interest you, and 3) the coursework that comes with each option. A professional report is typically a more applied project and can allow you to produce an example of the type of work that you hope to do after graduation. PR topics are more practice oriented and often result in recommendations for a specific place. You can think of a PR as a work sample that you will be able to show to prospective employers to give them a sense of your interests and skills. A thesis is typically a more academic project and places greater emphasis on theories framing your topic and justification of your particular research questions and study site. You should also allow more time to conduct thesis research. Students intending to pursue doctoral studies often choose to do a thesis. Students in the Latin American Studies and Sustainable Design dual degrees are required to choose the thesis option.
The thesis option requires that you dedicate more of your electives to your thesis project. Thesis students are required to take Research Design (offered in the fall semester only) and two semesters of Thesis research and writing time (Thesis A and Thesis B). You must take Thesis B the semester you graduate. Professional Report students take only one writing course (Professional Report), which must be taken the semester that you graduate.
The first step toward completion of your PR or Thesis is to write a short abstract that presents your topic and why you want to research it. The abstract is a 150-250-word description of the topic, why it’s important, and how you want to study it. You will (1) describe the broader planning debate/issue/concern that you wish to engage with, (2) describe the specific case AND place that you want to investigate, explaining why this case AND place might illuminate this broader debate/issue/concern in planning, (3) propose tentative research question(s), and (4) explain methods you might want to use. Once you submit your abstract, you will be matched with faculty members who will serve as your readers and help you with the following step: your proposal.
The second step is to write a proposal describing your topic and how you will investigate it. Your proposal should 1) introduce your topic and explain its relevance; 2) specify the questions/hypotheses that will be addressed; 3) delineate the methodology you will use, and explain why it is appropriate to your questions; 4) include a provisional chapter outline; 5) include a research plan and timeline; and, 6) include a source bibliography. Please see the following examples of PR proposals:
- PR Proposal sample_Green Infrastructure Development
- PR Proposal sample_Photo-Representations of Public Parks
- PR Proposal sample_Contradictions of Smart Growth
If you are planning to collect information from people, you must also consider the ways that your research might affect them and plan to mitigate any potential risks to participants. To better understand what risks your research might pose and whether you need to take extra steps to protect participants, you should first complete the university's IRB (Institutional Review Board) online training for student researchers. (Note: Expand the section "Apply for IRB review" and scroll down for information on submitting your proposal for review after you complete the training). Often our student research projects receive expedited review or a waiver from the full review process because our projects typically pose little risk to participants. For additional information about how the process might apply to your project, please contact the IRB program coordinator for the School of Architecture.
To get a better sense of the kinds of topics that are appropriate for either a PR or a Thesis, you can search for past projects in the UT Digital Repository. To find these, go to the "UT Electronic Theses and Dissertations" page on the UT Library website (www.lib.utexas.edu). You can then use the search menu to search for electronic theses and dissertation and search by department or subject (for example, "transit," "water," etc.). This should help you identify recent reports or theses. In addition, and to access reports prior to 2008, you can consult with the reference librarians in the Architecture and Planning Library in Battle Hall.
In order to graduate on time, you need to start working on your PR or Thesis research already in your first year. We help you do this by offering three PR/Thesis workshops in your first academic year. The workshops help you first identify a PR or thesis topic, next to write an abstract, and finally to develop your proposal. You will also participate in a matching process so you can start working with your first and second readers before the end of your first academic year. This process positions you to start conducting your research in the summer, so you can develop your outline and start writing in fall semester, making it easier to finish your PR or thesis in time for graduation in May.
The registration process and deadlines differ between the PR and Thesis options. Before you can enroll in the first course in the Thesis sequence (Thesis A) you must discuss topic ideas with your intended committee members, write a proposal and obtain the signatures of your two committee members on the PR/Thesis form and submit the proposal and form to Robin Dusek in the Graduate Office by the last class day of the semester before you will enroll in Thesis A. If you are writing a PR, you must submit the PR/Thesis form and proposal to Robin the semester before you will enroll in the PR course. So, if you are intending to write a Thesis and graduate in May, you would be submitting your proposal by the end of the summer session in order to enroll in Thesis A in the fall. If you are intending to write a PR and graduate in May, you would be submitting your proposal in the fall semester.
Whether you are writing a Thesis or a PR, the Chair of your committee must be a member of the CRP Graduate Studies Committee. The second reader can another UT faculty member or (for a PR) can be a professional outside of the university with knowledge of your topic.
|Discuss topic ideas with faculty||Fall semester of first year||Fall semester of first year|
|Write abstract and be matched with readers||Early spring of first year||Early spring, first year|
|Write draft proposal, discuss with faculty, agree upon timeline for research and faculty review||Late spring semester, first year||Late spring, first year|
|Obtain signatures, submit final proposal and form||By the end of the second summer session, first year||By early fall semester; date TBA|
|Contact IRB program contact, determine if proposal review required, submit proposal for review||Late spring semester, first year||Late spring, first year|
|Enroll in courses||Enroll in Research Design and Thesis A, fall of second year||Enroll in PR course, spring of second year|
|Conduct research||Begin in summer before year two||Begin in summer before year two|
|Present full draft to committee for review and comments||By end of March or date agreed upon with committee|
|Have format checked and approved by the graduate school (format guidelines)||Early April (while awaiting faculty feedback)|
|File final version with the graduate school (submission instructions)||Last class day of spring semester|
|Graduate!!||Late May. Congratulations|
The following are examples of exemplary Professional Reports and Theses completed by CRP graduates in recent years:
- Megan Shannon, Quantifying the Impacts of Regulatory Delay on Housing Affordability and Quality in Austin, Texas, 2015
- Vivek Shastry Subramanya, Mapping Energy Access: A regional energy planning framework for rural electrification in India, 2015
- Na Fu, The Participatory Process of the Urban Village Redevelopment Case Study in Shenzhen, China, 2014
- Kathryn Vickery, Barriers to and Opportunities for Commercial Urban Farming: Case Studies from Austin, Texas and New Orleans, Louisiana, 2014
- William Flemming, Towards a Megaregional Future: Prologue, Progress, and Potential Applications, 2013
- Claire Witter, Community-based Agriculture and the Implications for Central Texas, 2012
- Scott Dunlop, How Varying Levels of Community Participation Affect Brownfield Redevelopments: Case Study Comparisons in Pittsburgh, PA, Portland, OR, Dallas, TX, and Fort Worth, TX, 2012
- Lindsey Engelman, The Forgotten Case of Esmeraldas: Perceptions of Contamination and Collective Action in an Ecuadorian Refinery Town, 2011
- Celeste Griffin, Arts-Based Adaptive Reuse Development in Birmingham, Alabama, 2011
- Adam Ogusky, Creating Austin: Making Visible the Goals and Norms of Cultural Planning, 2010
- Sabina Mora, The Survey as a Public Input Tool in City Parks and Recreation Departments: Do Representative Surveys Matter in Decision Making?, 2010
- Christeen Pusch, An Analysis of Informal Housing: The Case of Los Platanitos, Santo Domingo Norte, Dominican Republic, 2010
- Julia Raish, Best Practices in Green Affordable Housing, 2008
- Elizabeth Walsh, Green Jobs for All: A Case Study of the Green Building Sector in Austin, TX, 2008